top of page

'Survival of the fittest' or 'survival of the community'?

Writer: Jilly EdmundsonJilly Edmundson

When Charles Darwin introduced the theory of natural selection in On the Origin of Species, he forever changed the way we think about life and survival. Natural selection, often summarized as "survival of the fittest," suggests that organisms best adapted to their environments are more likely to survive and reproduce. Over generations, these advantageous traits become more common, shaping the evolution of species.

But what happens when we take a closer look at our species—humans? Could it be that the ultimate determinant of survival isn’t just individual fitness but something more collective? What if it’s the survival of the community that ultimately ensures the future of humankind?


The basics of Natural Selection

Darwin’s theory is built on a few fundamental principles:

  • Variation: All living organisms have slight differences—whether it’s speed, strength, or intelligence.

  • Competition: Resources like food, water, and shelter are limited, creating competition among species.

  • Reproduction of the "Fittest": Those with traits that offer the best chance of survival are more likely to reproduce and pass on their genes.

This competitive framework works brilliantly for countless species in nature. The fastest gazelle avoids the cheetah, the strongest lion secures the pride, and over time, these traits become embedded in their respective populations.

But humans are, in many ways, unique. Our survival isn’t just about who can run the fastest or think the quickest. It’s about relationships and support systems. Our strength lies not just in ourselves, but in the bonds we forge.


Why community matters

Humans thrive in groups. Unlike solitary hunters like tigers, we’re wired to connect, collaborate, and most importantly—depend on one another. While individual traits like intelligence or resilience may help us survive the day-to-day pressures of life, community support can often make or break our ability to weather long-term challenges, be they physical, psychological, or spiritual.


The role of relationships

Take our mental health, for example. Numerous studies have shown that loneliness is as much of a health risk as smoking or obesity. A famous study from Harvard, which has spanned over 80 years, revealed a significant insight: strong personal connections are one of the greatest predictors of happiness and health. It’s not wealth, fame, or IQ—it’s relationships.

Imagine two individuals facing the same adversity. One has a small but supportive community of friends or family, while the other tackles challenges alone. Who is likelier to come out stronger? The science is clear—community often trumps individual grit.


A case study in resilience

Consider a village that survives a natural disaster, such as the devastating 2004 Boxing Day tsunami. Survival wasn’t solely defined by individual strength or "fitness." Communities that pooled their resources, looked out for each other, and worked collectively for survival saw significantly better outcomes. Those networks of humans deeply depended on cooperation. From rescuing neighbors to sharing supplies, it was the unity—not individual competition—that enabled survival.

Now think about this in wider terms. If humans depended solely on individual "fitness," societies might crumble in the face of adversities like pandemics, economic crises, or environmental disasters. It’s not the sharpest mind or the strongest body that ensures humanity’s survival—it’s collaboration.


Nature’s example of community survival

This idea of community transcending individualism is not just limited to humans. Nature is full of examples where survival depends on collective effort rather than isolated competition.

Take bees, for instance. A bee colony flourishes because every member plays a role. Worker bees gather nectar, drones mate with the queen, and the queen ensures the next generation. No single bee can survive outside the hive for long; they each depend on the community to thrive.

Similarly, wolves hunt not as solitary predators but as packs. Their collective strength allows them to take down larger prey, which wouldn’t be possible alone. Even trees, often thought of as solitary organisms, form vast underground networks through mycorrhizal fungi to share nutrients and communicate with one another. Without this underground "community," many trees would struggle to survive.


Rethinking "Fittest"

Taken on its own, Darwin's concept of "the fittest" might give the impression that survival is about rugged individualism. But fitness, especially in humans, doesn’t mean only physical prowess or mental sharpness. True fitness might be defined by our ability to connect and contribute to a larger system or community.

Sure, personal strengths matter—your ability to adapt, to learn, and to keep going under pressure. But those traits come alive and flourish when paired with the support of others. A strong athlete is molded by coaches, teammates, and fans. A scientist’s breakthrough often rides on the collective thoughts of the mentors, peers, and research community before them.


The modern takeaway

For us, modern humans—health-conscious individuals, spiritual seekers, and science enthusiasts alike—the challenge is not just to be strong on our own but to build stronger communities. When we invest in connecting, nurturing, and uplifting those around us, we’re effectively ensuring that we, too, will be uplifted in our times of need.


The balance between individual and community

Does this mean we abandon all competition? Of course not. Competition can drive us to innovate, improve, and excel. The drive to be better individually often fosters personal growth. But when we balance that drive with a sense of community, we become more than just survivors—we thrive.

It’s not "survival of the fittest" or "survival of the community." It’s both. The individual is the building block, but the community creates the foundation for sustained survival.


Darwin’s ideas sparked one of the greatest scientific revolutions of all time, and they remain as true today as they were in the 19th century. But as we contemplate the role of community in survival—whether it’s in our personal lives, the workplace, or global society—it becomes clear that the fittest aren’t always the strongest or the smartest. Often, they’re the most connected.

When we view survival through the lens of community, a whole new perspective emerges, one that aligns with both science and spirituality. Perhaps, it’s not just about me, but about we.

Take this as a gentle reminder to check in with your loved ones or contribute to your community today. After all, humanity’s survival may depend on it.

 
 
bottom of page